![]() ![]() Known formally as the “Hawkins & Peale’s Patent Polygraph No. Though the autopen wasn’t used in the White House until the 1950s, the history of the automated autograph dates back much further. A precursor of sorts to the autopen, the polygraph, was first patented in 1803 by John Isaac Hawkins and, within a year, was being used by noted early adopter Thomas Jefferson. And now he’s used it again to approve the fiscal cliff deal from more than 4,800 miles away and, in so doing, has returned the autopen to the national spotlight. Barack Obama was the first American President to use the autopen to sign a bill into law, which he first did on when he authorized an extension of the Patriot Act from France. More recently though, it has taken on a higher profile role in the White House. Traditionally, the autopen has been reserved for personal correspondence and documents. ![]() However, the White House autopen was a closely guarded secret until Gerald Ford’s administration publicly acknowledged its use. Harry Truman was the first President to use one in office and Kennedy allegedly made substantial use of the device. #Does president obama use a prompter free#We can’t know the exact details of Obama’s autopen because, as one might expect of a machine capable of signing any document by the “Leader of the Free World,” the White House autopen is kept under tight security (a fact that lends itself so well to the plot of a political thriller or National Treasure sequel, I can’t believe it hasn’t been made yet). Yet we do know a few things about the Presidential auto-autographer. #Does president obama use a prompter portable#The machines are small enough to be portable and versatile enough to hold any instrument and write on any surface. The autopen can store multiple signature files digitally on a SD card, meaning that a single device can reproduce everything from John Hancock’s John Hancock to Barack Obama’s. We conclude that most differences between presidential campaign rhetoric and governing rhetoric, at least in the case of Barack Obama, seem to be caused by the specifics of the political environment.It would take a well-trained eye to spot the difference between a hand-written signature and an autosignature. Even though it is essentially the product of a soulless automaton, the robotically signed signature is usually perceived to be more authentic than a rubber stamp or digital print because it is actually “written” by a multi-axis robotic arm ( see it in action on YouTube). We find no statistical difference in the level of certainty or inclusiveness that he used before or after taking office. We find that, in general, Obama's campaign and governing rhetoric are consistent, suggesting that he used the rhetoric of the campaign to help build a basis for governance. We compare speeches on certainty, positivity, and inclusiveness. We compare candidate Barack Obama's campaign speeches with his governing speeches to determine if his rhetoric on the campaign trail provides the basis for his later governance. Are the skills presidents require to be elected the same skills they will need once they assume office? Is there a change in rhetoric between presidential campaigning and presidential governing? The objective of this article is to examine those questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |